Medical report presented by Blessing CEO belonged to another patient — Delta NMA

The Delta State branch of the Nigerian Medical Association (NMA) has officially distanced itself from a medical report recently presented by controversial media personality Blessing Okoro, popularly known as Blessing CEO.

In a statement released earlier today, Tuesday, April 7, 2026, the NMA confirmed that the document in question actually belongs to another patient and was allegedly "doctored" or misused.

The Claim: Blessing CEO recently shared a medical report on social media to support her claims regarding a private health matter (reportedly linked to a recent surgical procedure or a health clearance).

The NMA’s Findings: After a brief investigation, the Delta NMA revealed that the patient registration number and the clinical details on the document match those of a different individual who was treated at a facility in Delta State.

Unauthorized Use: The NMA clarified that no such report was issued to Blessing Okoro by the facility named in the document, labeling the act a serious breach of medical ethics and a potential criminal offense involving the falsification of medical records.

The Delta NMA Chairman emphasized the following points in the press briefing:

Medical Privacy: The association condemned the public display of medical records, noting that it undermines the confidentiality of the actual patient whose information was exposed.

Legal Implications: The association hinted at a possible petition to the Medical and Dental Council of Nigeria (MDCN) and security agencies to investigate how the private document was obtained.

Warning to the Public: The public has been advised to verify medical claims made by influencers, especially those promoting "quick-fix" medical results or surgical outcomes.

Blessing CEO has yet to provide a formal rebuttal to the NMA's specific allegations. However, this development follows a pattern of recent legal and social media battles involving the influencer, including past disputes over property ownership and surgical procedures. Legal experts suggest that if the real patient decides to sue, the influencer could face significant civil and criminal liabilities for identity theft and forgery.